Which of the following is a strategy to promote mutual accountability in an organization?

Which of the following is a strategy to promote mutual accountability in an organization?

• A. Setting individual goals only
• B. Creating shared goals for teams
• C. Discouraging communication among team members
• D. Implementing hierarchical decision-making only

Answer: (B)

Creating shared goals for teams is a key strategy in promoting mutual accountability within an organization. When teams have collective objectives, every member understands their contributions to the overall success, which fosters a sense of responsibility not only for their own performance but also for the performance of their peers. This collaborative framework encourages individuals to support one another, monitor progress together, and collectively address challenges, thereby reinforcing the idea that everyone is accountable for achieving the shared goals. This sense of mutual accountability enhances teamwork, improves communication, and leads to better organizational outcomes as everyone works towards a common purpose. In contrast, focusing solely on individual goals can lead to competition among team members, thereby detracting from cooperation and shared responsibility. Discouraging communication among team members blocks collaboration, which is counterproductive to mutual accountability. Similarly, implementing a strictly hierarchical decision-making process can hinder the input and accountability of team members, as it places decision authority solely at the top, ignoring the collaborative effort required for shared objectives.

Creating shared goals for teams is a key strategy in promoting mutual accountability within an organization. When teams have collective objectives, every member understands their contributions to the overall success, which fosters a sense of responsibility not only for their own performance but also for the performance of their peers. This collaborative framework encourages individuals to support one another, monitor progress together, and collectively address challenges, thereby reinforcing the idea that everyone is accountable for achieving the shared goals. This sense of mutual accountability enhances teamwork, improves communication, and leads to better organizational outcomes as everyone works towards a common purpose.

In contrast, focusing solely on individual goals can lead to competition among team members, thereby detracting from cooperation and shared responsibility. Discouraging communication among team members blocks collaboration, which is counterproductive to mutual accountability. Similarly, implementing a strictly hierarchical decision-making process can hinder the input and accountability of team members, as it places decision authority solely at the top, ignoring the collaborative effort required for shared objectives.